Connect with us

Altcoins

The MultiverseX Monetary Meltdown: Justin Bons Ignites a Crypto Powder Keg Over EGLD’s Supply Cap

Avatar photo

Published

on

The Spark That Lit the Fire

In the high-stakes world of blockchain governance, few decisions carry more weight—or risk—than rewriting a token’s economic code. On October 3, 2025, MultiverseX (formerly Elrond) submitted a governance proposal that did just that: eliminate the hard supply cap on EGLD, its native token, and introduce a permanent 9.47% annual inflation rate.

This wasn’t a minor tweak. It struck at the very foundation of EGLD’s identity as a “sound money” asset with a fixed cap and built-in deflationary mechanics. The response from the crypto community was swift and polarizing. Memes spread like wildfire, accusations of greed and betrayal surfaced, and EGLD’s branding as a scarce asset was thrown into question.

Then came the megaphone. Justin Bons, CIO of CyberCapital and a well-known figure in the crypto economic space, issued a scathing condemnation of the proposal that sent tremors throughout the ecosystem. His words—“the worst token economics I have ever seen”—turned an already contentious issue into the most volatile drama of the month.


Breaking Down the Proposal

MultiverseX originally built EGLD around a simple promise: a maximum token supply of roughly 31.4 million. With transaction fees partially burned, the system was designed to trend deflationary as the network grew. The cap gave long-term holders confidence that their share of the network wouldn’t be diluted by inflation.

But the project now argues that its tokenomics are holding it back. The new proposal recommends eliminating the cap and introducing an annual inflation rate of 9.47%, derived from four years of economic modeling. Newly minted tokens would be funneled into ecosystem-building efforts, not dumped into the open market.

The newly proposed allocation model directs emissions toward three core areas:

  • Staking Rewards (~50%): To incentivize validators and encourage staking participation above 65% of circulating supply, targeting 9–12% annual returns.
  • Active Yield and Ecosystem Growth (~50%): Split between liquidity incentives in DeFi applications (~20%) and ecosystem investments via MultiverseX Labs (~30%), covering efforts like stablecoins, decentralized ETFs, and tokenized real-world assets.

The most controversial element is the Reflexive Strategic Investment (RSI) mechanism. This model enables additional EGLD to be minted when the price crosses certain thresholds ($20, $35, $50, and so on). But the catch is that these tokens are locked for three years and must be staked, essentially serving as long-term capital for protocol growth.

MultiverseX’s team, particularly core developer Robert Sasu, has framed this as a necessary evolution. They argue that EGLD is caught in a stagflation trap: low activity and low inflation, with neither fueling the kind of adoption needed to compete in today’s Layer 1 arena. The RSI, they claim, is a strategic unlock designed to jumpstart demand without tanking market confidence.


Justin Bons’ Nuclear Response

If MultiverseX thought this pivot would go unnoticed, they underestimated the influence of Bons. On October 5, he published a now-viral thread denouncing the new economics. His critique went far beyond inflation math—he framed the proposal as a philosophical breach of trust.

Bons’ message resonated strongly with the sound-money crowd. He accused the project of retroactively changing the rules of the game, effectively betraying holders who bought in under the assumption that EGLD was capped. He drew a hard line against RSI, calling it a tool for insiders to mint and lock capital while diluting everyone else.

He also noted that inflation of 9.47% was significantly higher than Milton Friedman’s famous 3–5% “k-percent rule” for monetary stability. In his view, this level of issuance was not only aggressive but borderline reckless. Worse, he implied that the team behind MultiverseX was creating a mechanism that could be gamed—hit price targets, mint more tokens, pump the market, and repeat.

His words had impact. The community response exploded, spawning hashtags like #VoteNo and memes portraying EGLD as a broken money printer. Former holders piled on. Others echoed his sentiment that this marked a philosophical turning point, not just a fiscal one.


In Defense of the Pivot

Still, MultiverseX has not backed down—and neither have its defenders. They point out that Bons himself is no stranger to supporting inflationary ecosystems. Solana, a chain he frequently praises, maintains an annual tail emission rate of 5–8%. It has experienced outages and delays, yet it has grown rapidly thanks in part to generous capital allocations and strategic emissions.

Supporters argue that the new proposal is, in fact, a more disciplined and purposeful model than many of its competitors. The RSI unlocks are structured, vested, and tied to price milestones, reducing the risk of dumping. The inflation is not arbitrary; it’s designed to be productive and strategic.

Crucially, the plan retains EGLD’s burn mechanism. Ninety percent of transaction fees will still be destroyed, meaning that with sufficient network activity, the system could still achieve deflationary outcomes in the long term. Right now, transaction fee volume is low—reportedly around $5,000 to $7,000 per day—but if the new investments spark usage, the equation could shift.

Ultimately, the defenders see this as a bet on growth. With more capital for incentives, EGLD could break free from stagnation and become competitive again in a world dominated by highly active chains.


Clash of Cultures: Trust vs. Adaptation

What makes this moment so charged is not just the math—it’s the culture clash underneath. Bons represents the principled, scarcity-focused camp that sees value in hard promises and immutable contracts. MultiverseX, in this moment, is aligning itself with the adaptive camp, willing to experiment in pursuit of growth and survival.

This has led to fierce pushback from some EGLD holders who feel betrayed. Others accuse Bons of overreacting or seeking engagement clout. Tribalism has taken over parts of the debate, with each side accusing the other of hypocrisy, shilling, or lacking vision.

Interestingly, the controversy has also sparked renewed civic engagement. The governance vote on the Agora platform has seen heightened activity. While the final tally is not yet public, early indications suggest the community is leaning toward approval.


Looking Ahead

The coming weeks will determine whether this drama ends in transformation or fracture. Several key indicators will be worth watching closely:

  • The final vote outcome: A “yes” vote gives MultiverseX the green light to implement its new model. A “no” preserves the cap but may force a reevaluation of network strategy.
  • Staking participation and validator behavior: If rewards decline or confidence drops, validator attrition could weaken network security.
  • Transaction fees and on-chain activity: The success of the inflation-burn dynamic hinges on usage. If the RSI-fueled growth fails to materialize, the risk of unchecked dilution looms.
  • Ecosystem momentum: Watch for new projects, partnerships, and capital flows. These will ultimately determine whether the gamble pays off.

Final Thoughts: Evolution or Betrayal?

The decision to remove EGLD’s supply cap is about more than inflation. It’s a referendum on whether crypto projects can—or should—change their foundational promises in the name of survival.

Justin Bons was right to sound the alarm. The decision to alter core tokenomics should never be taken lightly. Yet, if the MultiverseX community believes this is the only viable path to long-term relevance, then the project may be evolving, not unraveling.

One thing is certain: this moment will define EGLD for years to come. Either it becomes a cautionary tale of broken trust—or a bold case study in how to adapt without losing your soul.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Altcoins

Meme Coins Are Losing Their Mojo — From 20 % of Crypto Buzz to Just 2.5 % This Year

Avatar photo

Published

on

Meme‑Coin Hype Takes a Hard Hit

A recent report shows that collective interest in meme coins has plunged from about 20 % of all crypto chatter in late 2024 to roughly 2.5 % by October 2025 — a collapse of nearly 90 %. This shift reflects not only a drop in social buzz but also a broader retreat of speculative enthusiasm across the market. What once felt like the wild west of crypto — rapid launches, viral marketing and huge price swings — is cooling fast.


Market Metrics Confirm the Slide

The decline isn’t just anecdotal. Over the past year, more than 13 million meme tokens flooded the market, many with little to no utility — and most quickly vanished or failed. In a sector built on hype, many of these coins turned out to be short‑lived bets. Overall, the fully diluted market capitalization of memes has dropped by nearly 50 % year‑to‑date, according to blockchain analytics firms.

Trading volume has also cratered. In the first quarter of 2025, memecoin trading volume reportedly fell by 63 %. In many markets, memecoins’ share of overall trading volume dropped below 4 %, marking a dramatic retreat from their previous prominence.


What’s Driving the Decline

The collapse appears driven by a mix of oversaturation, weak fundamentals, and shifting investor preference. The meme‑coin ecosystem became overcrowded — tens of millions of projects launched, many with no clear roadmap or utility beyond chasing quick returns. That oversupply, combined with a broader crypto market slump, has wreaked havoc on liquidity and investor confidence.

Some analysts also cite growing regulatory scrutiny and a rising demand for real utility and transparency rather than hype‑driven “get‑rich‑quick” schemes. Meanwhile, capital and attention are rotating toward more tangible crypto sectors — such as AI‑powered tokens, infrastructure projects, DeFi, privacy coins and even traditional‑finance–style crypto instruments.


Could This Be a “Generational Bottom”?

Some within the community argue that the crash may bottom out soon — and that a new cycle could follow. Once the “dead weight” of unsustainable projects is cleared out, more serious, utility‑driven tokens could regain attention. Others believe the meme‑coin era may be effectively over — that the speculative mania has dissipated, and unless a meme coin brings real innovation or value, investors will avoid it.


Broader Implications for Crypto Markets

The downfall of meme coins underscores a broader maturation of the crypto industry in 2025. Markets appear to be shedding excess speculation and gravitating toward assets with fundamentals. This could lead to healthier ecosystem growth, better token design, and more sustainable long‑term investment — but also less room for high‑risk, high‑reward “moonshot” plays that defined crypto’s early years.

Continue Reading

Altcoins

NYSE Arca Files to Launch Altcoin-Focused ETF

Avatar photo

Published

on

Fresh Rule‑Change Proposal Seeks Green Light From SEC

A fresh proposal filed by NYSE Arca could soon bring a new kind of cryptocurrency investment product to the U.S. market. In partnership with asset management giant T. Rowe Price, the exchange is seeking regulatory approval to list an actively managed crypto ETF that goes beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. If approved, the fund would give investors exposure to a mix of top altcoins—like Solana, XRP, Cardano, and more—through a traditional stock exchange, eliminating the need for wallets, private keys, or crypto trading accounts.


What the Fund Would Do: A Broad, Actively‑Managed Crypto Basket

The Fund isn’t a passive single‑asset product but aims for active management. Its objective is to outperform the FTSE Crypto US Listed Index over the long term.

At launch the Fund intends to hold a diversified basket of “Eligible Assets,” which currently include major tokens such as Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), Solana (SOL), XRP, Cardano (ADA), Avalanche (AVAX), Litecoin (LTC), Polkadot (DOT), Dogecoin (DOGE), Hedera (HBAR), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Chainlink (LINK), Stellar (XLM), and Shiba Inu (SHIB).

The Fund may hold as few as five, or as many as fifteen, crypto assets at any given time — and is not strictly tied to the index’s weighting. It may over‑ or underweight certain assets, or include crypto outside the index, guided by active selection criteria such as valuations, momentum and fundamental factors.

The idea is to give investors exposure to a diversified crypto portfolio without having to manage wallets, custody, and rebalancing — while potentially delivering better returns than a static, index‑tracking fund.


Risk Controls, Custody and Governance

To ensure safety and regulatory compliance, the Fund will store its crypto holdings with a dedicated crypto custodian. Private keys will be secured under strict controls, preventing unauthorized access or misuse.

When the Fund stakes any crypto (if staking is employed), it will maintain policies to ensure sufficient liquidity to meet redemptions, especially if a large portion of assets becomes illiquid or locked.

Valuation of the crypto holdings — used to compute Net Asset Value (NAV) per share — will rely on reference rates from third‑party price providers, aggregated across multiple platforms. The NAV will be computed daily, aligned with close of trading on the Exchange or 4:00 p.m. E.T.


Why It Matters for Crypto and Traditional Finance

This filing reflects a broader shift in traditional financial markets embracing diversified, regulated crypto investment vehicles. Unlike earlier spot‑crypto ETFs designed for single assets (e.g., Bitcoin), this Fund proposes a multi‑asset, actively managed basket — potentially appealing to institutional investors and diversified‑portfolio allocators seeking crypto exposure with traditional ETF convenience.

If approved, the Fund would offer a streamlined, compliance‑friendly bridge between traditional capital markets and crypto assets, lowering operational friction for investors who prefer not to deal with wallets, exchanges, or self‑custody.

The approach may also set a precedent: showing that active crypto ETFs can meet listing standards under rules originally written for commodity‑based trusts. This could open the door for more innovation — perhaps funds targeting niche themes (smart‑contract tokens, layer‑2s, tokenized real‑assets) while still abiding by exchange and regulatory requirements.


What’s Next

The SEC review period typically spans up to 45 days from publication (or longer if extended), during which comments from market participants and the public may shape the final decision.

If approved, it may take some additional time before shares begin trading — during which documents like the fund’s prospectus, ETF symbol, and listing date will be finalized and disclosed by the sponsor.

Continue Reading

Altcoins

Securitize Breaks New Ground: EU Greenlights Blockchain-Based Securities Exchange on Avalanche

Avatar photo

Published

on

In a major development for the future of digital finance, Securitize has secured approval from European regulators to launch a fully regulated tokenized trading and settlement system using blockchain infrastructure. The move positions Securitize as the first entity authorized to run a DLT-powered securities exchange under the European Union’s Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) Pilot Regime—and it’s choosing Avalanche to power its operations.

From Fintech Middleman to Full-Fledged Market Operator

Until now, Securitize has been best known as a digital asset enabler, acting as a transfer agent and broker-dealer for tokenized securities, particularly in the U.S. market. But with this new license, granted by Spain’s Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV), the company is evolving into a full-blown market infrastructure provider across all 27 EU member states.

This transformation is not symbolic. Securitize now holds the right to issue, trade, and settle tokenized financial instruments—from equities and bonds to funds and structured products—all on-chain. And crucially, this will be done within a regulated framework, providing the safeguards that institutions require.

Avalanche Selected for Institutional-Grade Performance

To make this vision real, Securitize has chosen Avalanche as the underlying blockchain. The rationale is technical and strategic: Avalanche’s architecture offers near-instant finality, high throughput, and customizable subnets, features that align with the compliance and performance demands of capital markets.

The use of Avalanche isn’t merely cosmetic—it reflects a fundamental shift in how market infrastructure can be built. Instead of retrofitting blockchains into legacy systems, Securitize is designing the platform from the ground up with blockchain-native capabilities, but under regulatory scrutiny. This ensures that investor protections, KYC/AML procedures, and auditability are baked into the system rather than added on.

Tokenization Enters Its Institutional Era

Tokenization is hardly a new concept, but regulatory inertia and infrastructure gaps have kept it on the sidelines. Securitize’s new status could change that. By integrating issuance, trading, and settlement into a single digital framework, it offers institutional players a practical, legally compliant path into tokenized finance.

Real-world assets (RWAs) like corporate bonds, private equity, and even real estate can now be fractionalized and traded in near real-time. The efficiency gains—from lower settlement risk to reduced administrative overhead—are potentially game-changing. But what makes this moment different is not just the tech; it’s the regulatory blessing that now accompanies it.

The pilot regime allows Securitize to experiment in a live environment without skirting the rules. It’s a sandbox with teeth: serious enough for institutional engagement, yet flexible enough to innovate.

A Cross-Atlantic Infrastructure with Global Ambitions

Securitize’s European expansion doesn’t exist in isolation. The firm is already active in the United States, having facilitated tokenized offerings under SEC-compliant structures. The ability to bridge compliant infrastructure across the Atlantic is no small feat. If successful, it could lay the foundation for the first global, interoperable system for tokenized securities.

That ambition is bolstered by the firm’s all-in-one platform approach. Unlike many blockchain ventures that require third-party coordination for issuance, custody, trading, and compliance, Securitize offers a vertically integrated stack. This could prove especially attractive for asset managers looking to tokenize their offerings without building custom infrastructure from scratch.

The Road Ahead: High Stakes and Real Timelines

According to internal timelines, the first tokenized instruments on this new European platform are expected to launch in early 2026. That gives Securitize just over a year to finalize the technical, legal, and operational frameworks needed to go live.

But success will hinge on more than deadlines. To achieve real impact, Securitize must:

  • Convince major asset issuers—such as private equity firms, debt fund managers, and banks—to tokenize through its platform.
  • Deliver enough liquidity to make the exchange viable for secondary trading.
  • Prove that blockchain-based settlement is not just faster, but materially better in terms of cost, transparency, and security.

The broader market will be watching closely. Traditional exchanges, DeFi protocols, and regulators alike will be scrutinizing this launch as a bellwether for the viability of tokenized financial markets.

Conclusion: A Quiet Revolution in Plain Sight

With regulatory backing and a serious technological partner in Avalanche, Securitize has entered a rarefied position: not merely talking about the future of finance, but building it. If the rollout meets expectations, 2026 could mark a turning point—where securities trading takes a decisive step away from analog rails and embraces the digital, programmable, and borderless possibilities of blockchain.

In the ever-theoretical world of tokenization, Securitize now has a chance to make it real.

Continue Reading

Trending