News
Crypto Carnage: Trump’s Tariff Tweet Ignites $19B Liquidation Inferno — Was It a Setup?
- Share
- Tweet /data/web/virtuals/383272/virtual/www/domains/theunhashed.com/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 63
https://theunhashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/crash_black_friday-1000x600.png&description=Crypto Carnage: Trump’s Tariff Tweet Ignites $19B Liquidation Inferno — Was It a Setup?', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
Hey, crypto degenerates and HODLers — if you blinked on Friday, October 10, 2025, you might’ve missed one of the nastiest 24-hour meltdowns in crypto history. Over $19 billion in leveraged positions were liquidated, more than 1.6 million traders were margin-called into oblivion, and the crypto market saw hundreds of billions in market cap evaporate. Bitcoin tumbled sharply, altcoins were obliterated, and across the cryptosphere, a single question echoed: Was this a reaction to Donald Trump’s tariff shock—or was someone rigging the board?
We’re diving into what really happened, separating speculation from fact, correcting the narrative, and unpacking whether this was a market panic, a whale ambush, or both.
The Tariff Shock: Trump’s Tweet Hits Risk Assets
The chaos started with a single macro bombshell. Former President Donald Trump posted that the United States would impose a 100% tariff on Chinese imports—specifically targeting critical technologies, semiconductors, and electric vehicles. This move was presented as retaliation for China’s tightening grip on rare earth exports and other strategic materials, reigniting a full-blown U.S.-China trade war.
Markets reacted with immediate anxiety. Tech stocks tanked, especially semiconductor giants like Nvidia and Tesla. But crypto, ever the canary in the risk-asset coal mine, took the worst hit. Bitcoin, which had been trading around $124,000, plunged more than 8% in a matter of hours, eventually bottoming out near $104,782.
Ethereum followed with a 12% drop. Meme coins and DeFi tokens weren’t spared either—many shed 30% to 50% as panic selling took hold. The total crypto market cap shed nearly $400 billion in value by day’s end.
Leverage-Fueled Collapse: The Perfect Storm Unfolds
This wasn’t a run-of-the-mill correction—it was a brutal leverage flush. In the weeks leading up to the crash, sentiment had been euphoric. The crypto greed index had pushed past 60, and traders were stacking high-leverage longs across exchanges. Platforms like Binance, Bybit, and OKX saw growing open interest and overextended bullish bets.
When Trump’s tariff threat hit, it acted like a match to dry tinder. Prices began to fall, triggering liquidations on long positions. That selling pressure dragged prices lower, which in turn triggered more margin calls. It was a cascade—selling begetting more selling—magnified by the fact that it was a Friday afternoon, when liquidity across exchanges tends to thin out.
In just one hour, more than $7 billion in liquidations occurred. Across the day, over $19 billion was wiped from leveraged positions—setting a record for the largest 24-hour liquidation in crypto history. For context, that’s nearly 10 times larger than the total liquidations during the FTX implosion in 2022, and almost 20 times the volume seen during the COVID panic crash in March 2020.
Bitcoin’s sudden drop beneath $110,000 triggered additional stop-loss orders and panic exits, leading to flash crashes and thin order books. This amplified the impact even further, especially in low-volume environments like Hyperliquid, a decentralized derivatives platform that became one of the epicenters of the liquidation carnage.
Whale Tales: Was It a Setup?
Here’s where the story gets murky, controversial—and extremely online.
Crypto Twitter and Telegram were ablaze with theories that the crash wasn’t just a reaction to tariffs, but rather the result of a well-timed ambush by a shadowy whale. According to circulating reports, a trader—or group—opened massive short positions on Hyperliquid just 20 minutes before Trump’s post. The size of the bet? Over $1.1 billion in combined BTC and ETH shorts, allegedly with 10x leverage. The timing was uncanny, and profits were massive—estimates ranged from $150 million to nearly $200 million.
Was this luck, savvy trading, or something darker?
No exchange has confirmed this whale’s identity. Some have speculated links to defunct platforms like BitForex or even to early Bitcoin holders who have remained dormant for years. Others believe the whale may have anticipated the tweet or been tipped off in advance—raising concerns about insider information or strategic leaks from political or financial insiders.
So far, there is no concrete evidence proving insider trading. But the sequence of events—early morning market tremors, large short entries right before the tweet, and extreme liquidation volume isolated on Hyperliquid—has fueled speculation of coordination or even manipulation.
Market Mechanics and the Thin Line Between Chaos and Strategy
Regardless of whether the whale was lucky or informed, the crash exposed how fragile crypto markets remain. When prices dropped and long positions were liquidated en masse, exchanges became illiquid. Stop-loss cascades turned sharp drops into vertical plunges. There simply weren’t enough buyers in the books to absorb the volume, especially in off-peak trading hours.
This kind of cascading failure isn’t new in crypto. What made this one different was its scale—and the sense that a single macro tweet could trigger such systemic damage. It’s a reminder that crypto, for all its decentralization, remains deeply reactive to global policy shocks and structural vulnerabilities like excessive leverage.
Aftermath and Outlook: Volatility Ahead, But No Death Knell
In the days that followed, signs of recovery emerged. Bitcoin bounced modestly from its lows, and Ethereum found some support. Trump himself softened his rhetoric, suggesting that trade negotiations could still be on the table. Markets, both traditional and crypto, began stabilizing.
China issued warnings in response to the tariff threat, but so far, there has been no retaliatory action. Some analysts have speculated that the 100% tariff may be a bargaining tactic, not an imminent policy shift.
Crypto analysts agree: this was a structural shakeout, not a fundamental collapse. Excess leverage needed to be flushed, and Trump’s announcement provided the catalyst. Many now believe the market is positioned more healthily for a potential end-of-year rally, especially if macro tensions ease and regulation remains favorable.
Final Thoughts: Chaos Breeds Legends
This was not just another correction—it was a wipeout that tested every trader’s conviction, margin discipline, and trust in the system. It also demonstrated that in crypto, whales can move markets, macro can ignite destruction, and a single tweet can trigger a $19 billion bloodbath.
Whether the whale was just a trader with sharp instincts or someone with access to privileged information remains to be seen. Regulators haven’t commented. On-chain sleuths continue digging. But one thing is certain: when the dust settles, the legends of October 10 will become part of crypto lore.
So what’s your move now? Stay sidelined, buy the dip, or wait for the next tweet-fueled tremor? In crypto, one man’s crash is another’s origin story.
Ethereum
Small Kingdom, Big Move — Bhutan Stakes $970 K of ETH via Figment to Back National Blockchain Ambitions
Bhutan Turns Heads With Institutional‑Grade ETH Stake
The government of Bhutan quietly moved 320 ETH — worth roughly $970,000 — to Figment, the well-known staking provider, signaling a major shift in how the Himalayan kingdom engages with crypto. Rather than a speculative or retail‑style buy, this is an institutional‑level stake: the amount deployed corresponds to 10 full Ethereum validators (since each validator requires 32 ETH).
More Than Just Yield: Bhutan Anchors Crypto in Governance
Bhutan’s ETH stake comes on the heels of a far broader crypto‑adoption push. In October 2025 the country launched a sovereign national digital identity system — built not on a private chain, but on the public Ethereum blockchain. The decision to anchor citizen identities on a decentralized, globally supported network like Ethereum underscores a long‑term vision: decentralized identity, on‑chain transparency, and national infrastructure built with blockchain.
For Bhutan, this ETH stake isn’t about short‑term price swings or hype — it reflects a strategic bet on Proof‑of‑Stake infrastructure. By running validators via Figment, the government contributes to network security, potentially earns rewards, and aligns its own holdings and governance systems with the protocols underlying its digital‑ID rollout.
What This Signals for Ethereum — and for Crypto Governance
Though 320 ETH is a drop in the bucket compared to total staked ETH globally, the move carries symbolic weight. A sovereign state publicly committing funds to ETH staking via a recognized institutional provider adds to the broader narrative: that Proof‑of‑Stake networks are maturing, and that blockchain can underpin more than speculative assets — it can support identity, governance, and long-term infrastructure.
Moreover, it highlights that institutional staking services like Figment are increasingly trusted not only by hedge funds or corporations, but by governments. According to Figment’s own data, their Q3 2025 validator participation rate stood at 99.9%, and they reported zero slashing events — underlining the reliability such clients are counting on.
What to Watch Next
Will Bhutan stake more ETH? On‑chain data shows the wallet still holds a portion of ETH that remains unstaked — suggesting potential for future validator additions.
Will other nations follow suit? If Bhutan’s mixed use of crypto — combining reserve assets, public‑service infrastructure, and staking — proves viable, it could serve as a blueprint for other smaller states looking to modernize governance with blockchain.
Will this affect ETH’s valuation? Hard to say immediately. The 320 ETH is unlikely to move market prices by itself. But if this step becomes part of a larger trend toward institutional and sovereign staking, the cumulative effect on demand and network security could indirectly support ETH’s long-term value proposition.
Altcoins
Meme Coins Are Losing Their Mojo — From 20 % of Crypto Buzz to Just 2.5 % This Year
Meme‑Coin Hype Takes a Hard Hit
A recent report shows that collective interest in meme coins has plunged from about 20 % of all crypto chatter in late 2024 to roughly 2.5 % by October 2025 — a collapse of nearly 90 %. This shift reflects not only a drop in social buzz but also a broader retreat of speculative enthusiasm across the market. What once felt like the wild west of crypto — rapid launches, viral marketing and huge price swings — is cooling fast.
Market Metrics Confirm the Slide
The decline isn’t just anecdotal. Over the past year, more than 13 million meme tokens flooded the market, many with little to no utility — and most quickly vanished or failed. In a sector built on hype, many of these coins turned out to be short‑lived bets. Overall, the fully diluted market capitalization of memes has dropped by nearly 50 % year‑to‑date, according to blockchain analytics firms.
Trading volume has also cratered. In the first quarter of 2025, memecoin trading volume reportedly fell by 63 %. In many markets, memecoins’ share of overall trading volume dropped below 4 %, marking a dramatic retreat from their previous prominence.
What’s Driving the Decline
The collapse appears driven by a mix of oversaturation, weak fundamentals, and shifting investor preference. The meme‑coin ecosystem became overcrowded — tens of millions of projects launched, many with no clear roadmap or utility beyond chasing quick returns. That oversupply, combined with a broader crypto market slump, has wreaked havoc on liquidity and investor confidence.
Some analysts also cite growing regulatory scrutiny and a rising demand for real utility and transparency rather than hype‑driven “get‑rich‑quick” schemes. Meanwhile, capital and attention are rotating toward more tangible crypto sectors — such as AI‑powered tokens, infrastructure projects, DeFi, privacy coins and even traditional‑finance–style crypto instruments.
Could This Be a “Generational Bottom”?
Some within the community argue that the crash may bottom out soon — and that a new cycle could follow. Once the “dead weight” of unsustainable projects is cleared out, more serious, utility‑driven tokens could regain attention. Others believe the meme‑coin era may be effectively over — that the speculative mania has dissipated, and unless a meme coin brings real innovation or value, investors will avoid it.
Broader Implications for Crypto Markets
The downfall of meme coins underscores a broader maturation of the crypto industry in 2025. Markets appear to be shedding excess speculation and gravitating toward assets with fundamentals. This could lead to healthier ecosystem growth, better token design, and more sustainable long‑term investment — but also less room for high‑risk, high‑reward “moonshot” plays that defined crypto’s early years.
Altcoins
NYSE Arca Files to Launch Altcoin-Focused ETF
Fresh Rule‑Change Proposal Seeks Green Light From SEC
A fresh proposal filed by NYSE Arca could soon bring a new kind of cryptocurrency investment product to the U.S. market. In partnership with asset management giant T. Rowe Price, the exchange is seeking regulatory approval to list an actively managed crypto ETF that goes beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. If approved, the fund would give investors exposure to a mix of top altcoins—like Solana, XRP, Cardano, and more—through a traditional stock exchange, eliminating the need for wallets, private keys, or crypto trading accounts.
What the Fund Would Do: A Broad, Actively‑Managed Crypto Basket
The Fund isn’t a passive single‑asset product but aims for active management. Its objective is to outperform the FTSE Crypto US Listed Index over the long term.
At launch the Fund intends to hold a diversified basket of “Eligible Assets,” which currently include major tokens such as Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), Solana (SOL), XRP, Cardano (ADA), Avalanche (AVAX), Litecoin (LTC), Polkadot (DOT), Dogecoin (DOGE), Hedera (HBAR), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Chainlink (LINK), Stellar (XLM), and Shiba Inu (SHIB).
The Fund may hold as few as five, or as many as fifteen, crypto assets at any given time — and is not strictly tied to the index’s weighting. It may over‑ or underweight certain assets, or include crypto outside the index, guided by active selection criteria such as valuations, momentum and fundamental factors.
The idea is to give investors exposure to a diversified crypto portfolio without having to manage wallets, custody, and rebalancing — while potentially delivering better returns than a static, index‑tracking fund.
Risk Controls, Custody and Governance
To ensure safety and regulatory compliance, the Fund will store its crypto holdings with a dedicated crypto custodian. Private keys will be secured under strict controls, preventing unauthorized access or misuse.
When the Fund stakes any crypto (if staking is employed), it will maintain policies to ensure sufficient liquidity to meet redemptions, especially if a large portion of assets becomes illiquid or locked.
Valuation of the crypto holdings — used to compute Net Asset Value (NAV) per share — will rely on reference rates from third‑party price providers, aggregated across multiple platforms. The NAV will be computed daily, aligned with close of trading on the Exchange or 4:00 p.m. E.T.
Why It Matters for Crypto and Traditional Finance
This filing reflects a broader shift in traditional financial markets embracing diversified, regulated crypto investment vehicles. Unlike earlier spot‑crypto ETFs designed for single assets (e.g., Bitcoin), this Fund proposes a multi‑asset, actively managed basket — potentially appealing to institutional investors and diversified‑portfolio allocators seeking crypto exposure with traditional ETF convenience.
If approved, the Fund would offer a streamlined, compliance‑friendly bridge between traditional capital markets and crypto assets, lowering operational friction for investors who prefer not to deal with wallets, exchanges, or self‑custody.
The approach may also set a precedent: showing that active crypto ETFs can meet listing standards under rules originally written for commodity‑based trusts. This could open the door for more innovation — perhaps funds targeting niche themes (smart‑contract tokens, layer‑2s, tokenized real‑assets) while still abiding by exchange and regulatory requirements.
What’s Next
The SEC review period typically spans up to 45 days from publication (or longer if extended), during which comments from market participants and the public may shape the final decision.
If approved, it may take some additional time before shares begin trading — during which documents like the fund’s prospectus, ETF symbol, and listing date will be finalized and disclosed by the sponsor.
-
Cardano2 months agoCardano Breaks Ground in India: Trivolve Tech Launches Blockchain Forensic System on Mainnet
-
Cardano2 months agoCardano Reboots: What the Foundation’s New Roadmap Means for the Blockchain Race
-
Cardano2 days agoSolana co‑founder publicly backs Cardano — signaling rare cross‑chain respect after 2025 chain‑split recovery
-
Bitcoin2 months agoQuantum Timebomb: Is Bitcoin’s Foundation About to Crack?
-
Cardano2 months agoAfter the Smoke Clears: Cardano, Vouchers, and the Vindication of Charles Hoskinson
-
Cardano2 months agoMidnight and Google Cloud Join Forces to Power Privacy‑First Blockchain Infrastructure
-
Ripple2 months agoRipple CTO David “JoelKatz” Schwartz to Step Down by Year’s End, but Will Remain on Board
-
News2 months agoRipple’s DeFi Awakening: How mXRP Is Redefining the Role of XRP
