Connect with us

News

Trump’s Crypto Empire: How the Presidency Became a Revenue Engine

Avatar photo

Published

on

In October 2025, an Australian investigative program dropped a bombshell: while publicly claiming to have stepped back from his business interests, Donald Trump and his family have quietly leveraged the powers of the presidency to supercharge their crypto and business ventures. The revelations lay bare a high-stakes gamble — and possibly constitutional peril — at the intersection of politics, profits, and digital currencies.


From “I don’t do crypto” to Meme‑Coin Mogul

Not long ago, Donald Trump dismissed Bitcoin as a “scam.” Yet by May of the 2024 campaign, he was courting crypto lobbyists and declaring a pro-crypto platform if re-elected. The pivot, as reported, was not ideological — it aligned with a new business model engineered by his inner circle. In September 2025, the Trump family launched World Liberty Financial, a platform tied to a “meme coin” called $TRUMP.

The coin formally debuted just three days before Trump’s inauguration. One of its features: the Trump family takes a cut of each trade — reportedly 75 percent of sales profits. Trading fees alone reportedly generated some $320 million within months, and a later token sale brought in $550 million, with an estimated $390 million flowing to the Trump family.

By design, the coin also confers premium access: holders of the top $TRUMP balances were invited to a gala in Virginia with Trump himself, effectively buying proximity with status.


Blurred Lines: Business, Power & Political Leverage

The central critique is that Trump has crossed a line few presidents have ever approached — using the trappings of public office to fuel private gain. His defenders point out that the president’s assets were placed into a trust run by his sons. But critics argue that such a setup doesn’t shield one from conflicts when policy decisions, regulatory oversight, or foreign deals overlap with family profits.

A particularly stark example: the United Arab Emirates’ state investment arm, MGX, invested $2 billion in Binance via a World Liberty Financial token. The Trump family stood to benefit in the tens of millions. Shortly thereafter, Trump made a shift in U.S. foreign policy, approving sales of advanced AI chips to the UAE — previously restricted under the Biden administration. While there is no definitive proof of a quid pro quo, the timing and circles involved raise serious questions.

At the same time, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) litigation against crypto flaws—like the one involving crypto billionaire Justin Sun—has at least temporarily stalled. Sun himself invested $75 million in the $TRUMP system before and around inauguration day, which delivered significant returns to the Trump side.

Amid this, former SEC advisor Corey Frayer has warned that crypto’s opaque nature makes it a potential vehicle for influence-peddling.


Ethics, Legality — or Just Norms?

Is any of this illegal? Under current U.S. law, there is no blanket prohibition on presidents or their families earning money while in office. But ethics advisors warn that the “classical definition of corruption” — using public office for private gain — might well apply here.

Norm Eisen, former ethics counsel under Obama, calls Trump “the most corrupt president … in the modern era,” arguing that the scale of overlap between Trump’s presidency and his business interests is unprecedented.

Still, defenders argue that other presidents have benefited from favorable policies or tax changes. The difference, they say, is that Trump’s entanglements are far more direct and transparent — and therefore more vulnerable to abuse.


Implications for Democracy and the Crypto Space

Trump’s foray into crypto may represent more than a pecuniary windfall — it could reshape expectations around governance and regulatory norms. If crypto can be used to funnel resources and access to a president’s inner circle, questions of influence, oversight, and accountability escalate dramatically.

For the industry, Trump’s endorsement gives it a veneer of legitimacy — but also draws increased scrutiny. Regulators like the SEC would be under pressure to police potential conflicts, market manipulation, and financial integrity.

Internationally, the UAE-crypto link hints at new frontiers for geopolitics, where digital finance becomes one more lever in statecraft and investment.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ethereum

Small Kingdom, Big Move — Bhutan Stakes $970 K of ETH via Figment to Back National Blockchain Ambitions

Avatar photo

Published

on

Bhutan Turns Heads With Institutional‑Grade ETH Stake

The government of Bhutan quietly moved 320 ETH — worth roughly $970,000 — to Figment, the well-known staking provider, signaling a major shift in how the Himalayan kingdom engages with crypto. Rather than a speculative or retail‑style buy, this is an institutional‑level stake: the amount deployed corresponds to 10 full Ethereum validators (since each validator requires 32 ETH).


More Than Just Yield: Bhutan Anchors Crypto in Governance

Bhutan’s ETH stake comes on the heels of a far broader crypto‑adoption push. In October 2025 the country launched a sovereign national digital identity system — built not on a private chain, but on the public Ethereum blockchain. The decision to anchor citizen identities on a decentralized, globally supported network like Ethereum underscores a long‑term vision: decentralized identity, on‑chain transparency, and national infrastructure built with blockchain.

For Bhutan, this ETH stake isn’t about short‑term price swings or hype — it reflects a strategic bet on Proof‑of‑Stake infrastructure. By running validators via Figment, the government contributes to network security, potentially earns rewards, and aligns its own holdings and governance systems with the protocols underlying its digital‑ID rollout.


What This Signals for Ethereum — and for Crypto Governance

Though 320 ETH is a drop in the bucket compared to total staked ETH globally, the move carries symbolic weight. A sovereign state publicly committing funds to ETH staking via a recognized institutional provider adds to the broader narrative: that Proof‑of‑Stake networks are maturing, and that blockchain can underpin more than speculative assets — it can support identity, governance, and long-term infrastructure.

Moreover, it highlights that institutional staking services like Figment are increasingly trusted not only by hedge funds or corporations, but by governments. According to Figment’s own data, their Q3 2025 validator participation rate stood at 99.9%, and they reported zero slashing events — underlining the reliability such clients are counting on.


What to Watch Next

Will Bhutan stake more ETH? On‑chain data shows the wallet still holds a portion of ETH that remains unstaked — suggesting potential for future validator additions.

Will other nations follow suit? If Bhutan’s mixed use of crypto — combining reserve assets, public‑service infrastructure, and staking — proves viable, it could serve as a blueprint for other smaller states looking to modernize governance with blockchain.

Will this affect ETH’s valuation? Hard to say immediately. The 320 ETH is unlikely to move market prices by itself. But if this step becomes part of a larger trend toward institutional and sovereign staking, the cumulative effect on demand and network security could indirectly support ETH’s long-term value proposition.

Continue Reading

Altcoins

Meme Coins Are Losing Their Mojo — From 20 % of Crypto Buzz to Just 2.5 % This Year

Avatar photo

Published

on

Meme‑Coin Hype Takes a Hard Hit

A recent report shows that collective interest in meme coins has plunged from about 20 % of all crypto chatter in late 2024 to roughly 2.5 % by October 2025 — a collapse of nearly 90 %. This shift reflects not only a drop in social buzz but also a broader retreat of speculative enthusiasm across the market. What once felt like the wild west of crypto — rapid launches, viral marketing and huge price swings — is cooling fast.


Market Metrics Confirm the Slide

The decline isn’t just anecdotal. Over the past year, more than 13 million meme tokens flooded the market, many with little to no utility — and most quickly vanished or failed. In a sector built on hype, many of these coins turned out to be short‑lived bets. Overall, the fully diluted market capitalization of memes has dropped by nearly 50 % year‑to‑date, according to blockchain analytics firms.

Trading volume has also cratered. In the first quarter of 2025, memecoin trading volume reportedly fell by 63 %. In many markets, memecoins’ share of overall trading volume dropped below 4 %, marking a dramatic retreat from their previous prominence.


What’s Driving the Decline

The collapse appears driven by a mix of oversaturation, weak fundamentals, and shifting investor preference. The meme‑coin ecosystem became overcrowded — tens of millions of projects launched, many with no clear roadmap or utility beyond chasing quick returns. That oversupply, combined with a broader crypto market slump, has wreaked havoc on liquidity and investor confidence.

Some analysts also cite growing regulatory scrutiny and a rising demand for real utility and transparency rather than hype‑driven “get‑rich‑quick” schemes. Meanwhile, capital and attention are rotating toward more tangible crypto sectors — such as AI‑powered tokens, infrastructure projects, DeFi, privacy coins and even traditional‑finance–style crypto instruments.


Could This Be a “Generational Bottom”?

Some within the community argue that the crash may bottom out soon — and that a new cycle could follow. Once the “dead weight” of unsustainable projects is cleared out, more serious, utility‑driven tokens could regain attention. Others believe the meme‑coin era may be effectively over — that the speculative mania has dissipated, and unless a meme coin brings real innovation or value, investors will avoid it.


Broader Implications for Crypto Markets

The downfall of meme coins underscores a broader maturation of the crypto industry in 2025. Markets appear to be shedding excess speculation and gravitating toward assets with fundamentals. This could lead to healthier ecosystem growth, better token design, and more sustainable long‑term investment — but also less room for high‑risk, high‑reward “moonshot” plays that defined crypto’s early years.

Continue Reading

Altcoins

NYSE Arca Files to Launch Altcoin-Focused ETF

Avatar photo

Published

on

Fresh Rule‑Change Proposal Seeks Green Light From SEC

A fresh proposal filed by NYSE Arca could soon bring a new kind of cryptocurrency investment product to the U.S. market. In partnership with asset management giant T. Rowe Price, the exchange is seeking regulatory approval to list an actively managed crypto ETF that goes beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. If approved, the fund would give investors exposure to a mix of top altcoins—like Solana, XRP, Cardano, and more—through a traditional stock exchange, eliminating the need for wallets, private keys, or crypto trading accounts.


What the Fund Would Do: A Broad, Actively‑Managed Crypto Basket

The Fund isn’t a passive single‑asset product but aims for active management. Its objective is to outperform the FTSE Crypto US Listed Index over the long term.

At launch the Fund intends to hold a diversified basket of “Eligible Assets,” which currently include major tokens such as Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), Solana (SOL), XRP, Cardano (ADA), Avalanche (AVAX), Litecoin (LTC), Polkadot (DOT), Dogecoin (DOGE), Hedera (HBAR), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Chainlink (LINK), Stellar (XLM), and Shiba Inu (SHIB).

The Fund may hold as few as five, or as many as fifteen, crypto assets at any given time — and is not strictly tied to the index’s weighting. It may over‑ or underweight certain assets, or include crypto outside the index, guided by active selection criteria such as valuations, momentum and fundamental factors.

The idea is to give investors exposure to a diversified crypto portfolio without having to manage wallets, custody, and rebalancing — while potentially delivering better returns than a static, index‑tracking fund.


Risk Controls, Custody and Governance

To ensure safety and regulatory compliance, the Fund will store its crypto holdings with a dedicated crypto custodian. Private keys will be secured under strict controls, preventing unauthorized access or misuse.

When the Fund stakes any crypto (if staking is employed), it will maintain policies to ensure sufficient liquidity to meet redemptions, especially if a large portion of assets becomes illiquid or locked.

Valuation of the crypto holdings — used to compute Net Asset Value (NAV) per share — will rely on reference rates from third‑party price providers, aggregated across multiple platforms. The NAV will be computed daily, aligned with close of trading on the Exchange or 4:00 p.m. E.T.


Why It Matters for Crypto and Traditional Finance

This filing reflects a broader shift in traditional financial markets embracing diversified, regulated crypto investment vehicles. Unlike earlier spot‑crypto ETFs designed for single assets (e.g., Bitcoin), this Fund proposes a multi‑asset, actively managed basket — potentially appealing to institutional investors and diversified‑portfolio allocators seeking crypto exposure with traditional ETF convenience.

If approved, the Fund would offer a streamlined, compliance‑friendly bridge between traditional capital markets and crypto assets, lowering operational friction for investors who prefer not to deal with wallets, exchanges, or self‑custody.

The approach may also set a precedent: showing that active crypto ETFs can meet listing standards under rules originally written for commodity‑based trusts. This could open the door for more innovation — perhaps funds targeting niche themes (smart‑contract tokens, layer‑2s, tokenized real‑assets) while still abiding by exchange and regulatory requirements.


What’s Next

The SEC review period typically spans up to 45 days from publication (or longer if extended), during which comments from market participants and the public may shape the final decision.

If approved, it may take some additional time before shares begin trading — during which documents like the fund’s prospectus, ETF symbol, and listing date will be finalized and disclosed by the sponsor.

Continue Reading

Trending