Ethereum
Grayscale Makes History: First U.S. Spot Crypto ETPs with Built‑In Staking Go Live
- Share
- Tweet /data/web/virtuals/383272/virtual/www/domains/theunhashed.com/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 63
https://theunhashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/grayscale_staking_ETP2-1000x600.png&description=Grayscale Makes History: First U.S. Spot Crypto ETPs with Built‑In Staking Go Live', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
In a landmark move for regulated crypto investing, Grayscale has launched the first U.S. spot crypto exchange‑traded products (ETPs) that allow investors to stake their holdings automatically. With the debut of ETHE, ETH, and GSOL, Grayscale aims to bring yield accrual from proof‑of‑stake blockchains into the realm of traditional brokerage accounts. This melding of “buy-and-hold” access plus active protocol participation could shift how institutional and retail investors view exposure to digital assets.
What Exactly Is Launching?
Grayscale’s announcement revealed that two of its Ethereum‑based ETPs—ETHE (Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF) and ETH (Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF)—have become the first U.S.-listed spot crypto ETPs that offer staking to their holders. Meanwhile, GSOL (Grayscale Solana Trust) has also activated staking, though it currently trades on the OTC market rather than a major exchange.
The idea is that investors who buy shares in these products gain not just exposure to ETH or SOL price movements, but also a portion of staking rewards, all handled passively by Grayscale through its custodians and validator network. Grayscale frames this as “spot plus yield” — combining exposure to the base assets with income generation baked in.
It’s worth noting that ETHE and ETH are not registered under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, meaning they don’t fall under the full regulatory protections of conventional ETFs.
Why This Is a Big Deal
Lowering the barrier to staking is a central part of this innovation. Until now, staking ETH or SOL has typically required technical setup—running a node, locking funds, selecting validators, and managing the risks of slashing or downtime. By embedding staking into a managed ETP, Grayscale abstracts away the complexity and delivers passive income generation within a conventional investment vehicle.
Staking is also critical to the security and operations of proof-of-stake networks. By offering staking exposure, Grayscale is helping to align investor incentives with the long-term health and performance of the underlying blockchains. This represents a shift from passive speculation to active network participation, without the burden of direct protocol interaction.
For institutions, these products provide a regulatory-compliant way to gain both price and yield exposure. Custody concerns, KYC/AML restrictions, and internal compliance barriers often prevent direct crypto holdings. Grayscale’s products offer a workaround by delivering staking rewards within a traditional brokerage format.
In the broader ETP market, this innovation sets a precedent. Staking as a built-in feature may soon become table stakes for digital asset products, just as dividend reinvestment is in traditional equity funds. Grayscale is aiming to lead in a market where differentiation is increasingly vital.
Risks and Limitations
The move is not without its risks. ETHE and ETH are not 40‑Act registered, meaning investors do not benefit from the same regulatory oversight or protections as they would with standard ETFs. That raises structural and compliance considerations for many investors.
Staking itself carries specific risks. Validator performance, slashing penalties, and network-level failures can impact returns. Grayscale assumes these risks on behalf of investors, but how these dynamics are managed will be critical to long-term success.
The way staking rewards are calculated and passed through to shareholders—after fees, validator commissions, and operating costs—will materially affect the yield. Transparency in this area will be vital for investor confidence.
Liquidity is another consideration. As newly enhanced products, ETHE, ETH, and GSOL may face early trading challenges, especially as investors assess their structure and reward potential. In the case of GSOL, Grayscale has noted that the Solana ecosystem itself still carries speculative risk due to its relative immaturity.
Finally, tax and accounting implications could complicate matters. Staking income may be treated differently than capital gains, and those differences will require careful tracking by both investors and fund managers.
The Broader Context: Staking Meets TradFi
Grayscale’s new offerings arrive at a critical moment in crypto’s integration into traditional finance. With Ethereum’s switch to proof-of-stake following The Merge, the protocol opened up new avenues for yield generation. Yet operational complexity has prevented many investors from participating.
By combining staking with spot exposure in a regulated format, Grayscale is helping to mainstream one of the most important features of modern blockchains. This is not just about riding price waves—it’s about engaging with the protocol itself, earning yield for securing the network.
No other major ETP provider has yet brought staking rewards into their U.S.-listed crypto products. Grayscale is first, and this could force others to follow. In Europe, firms like 21Shares and CoinShares have experimented with similar features, but the U.S. remains the global center for capital markets innovation. If these products gain traction, it could unleash a new phase of crypto financialization—one where staking, lending, and other on-chain primitives are packaged for Wall Street.
What to Watch Going Forward
Market watchers will be closely monitoring whether GSOL makes the jump from OTC to a fully exchange-traded product. Such a move would signal confidence in Solana’s staking model and broader ecosystem maturity.
Investor flows into ETHE and ETH will also reveal much about appetite for staking-as-a-service. If yields are competitive and fees remain modest, these products could become go-to vehicles for crypto-curious institutions.
Another key issue will be transparency. Grayscale must show how staking rewards are tracked, how much is passed on, and how fees are structured. Without this, confidence may falter.
The regulatory reaction will also matter. The SEC and IRS may take new positions on embedded staking rewards, especially as tax treatment, security status, and yield dynamics intersect in novel ways.
And finally, we may see expansion. If Grayscale succeeds, it’s likely that other chains—such as Polkadot, Avalanche, or Cardano—could get their own staking-enabled ETPs. Even multi-chain baskets with staking rewards could appear.
Conclusion
Grayscale’s stake-enabled spot crypto ETPs represent a milestone in the maturation of digital asset investing. By combining passive exposure with on-chain yield, these products lower technical barriers, improve capital efficiency, and potentially change how investors interact with the crypto economy. But as with all innovation, execution will determine the outcome. Transparency, performance, and risk management will decide whether staking becomes the next frontier in financial product design—or just a bold experiment with limited uptake.
Ethereum
Small Kingdom, Big Move — Bhutan Stakes $970 K of ETH via Figment to Back National Blockchain Ambitions
Bhutan Turns Heads With Institutional‑Grade ETH Stake
The government of Bhutan quietly moved 320 ETH — worth roughly $970,000 — to Figment, the well-known staking provider, signaling a major shift in how the Himalayan kingdom engages with crypto. Rather than a speculative or retail‑style buy, this is an institutional‑level stake: the amount deployed corresponds to 10 full Ethereum validators (since each validator requires 32 ETH).
More Than Just Yield: Bhutan Anchors Crypto in Governance
Bhutan’s ETH stake comes on the heels of a far broader crypto‑adoption push. In October 2025 the country launched a sovereign national digital identity system — built not on a private chain, but on the public Ethereum blockchain. The decision to anchor citizen identities on a decentralized, globally supported network like Ethereum underscores a long‑term vision: decentralized identity, on‑chain transparency, and national infrastructure built with blockchain.
For Bhutan, this ETH stake isn’t about short‑term price swings or hype — it reflects a strategic bet on Proof‑of‑Stake infrastructure. By running validators via Figment, the government contributes to network security, potentially earns rewards, and aligns its own holdings and governance systems with the protocols underlying its digital‑ID rollout.
What This Signals for Ethereum — and for Crypto Governance
Though 320 ETH is a drop in the bucket compared to total staked ETH globally, the move carries symbolic weight. A sovereign state publicly committing funds to ETH staking via a recognized institutional provider adds to the broader narrative: that Proof‑of‑Stake networks are maturing, and that blockchain can underpin more than speculative assets — it can support identity, governance, and long-term infrastructure.
Moreover, it highlights that institutional staking services like Figment are increasingly trusted not only by hedge funds or corporations, but by governments. According to Figment’s own data, their Q3 2025 validator participation rate stood at 99.9%, and they reported zero slashing events — underlining the reliability such clients are counting on.
What to Watch Next
Will Bhutan stake more ETH? On‑chain data shows the wallet still holds a portion of ETH that remains unstaked — suggesting potential for future validator additions.
Will other nations follow suit? If Bhutan’s mixed use of crypto — combining reserve assets, public‑service infrastructure, and staking — proves viable, it could serve as a blueprint for other smaller states looking to modernize governance with blockchain.
Will this affect ETH’s valuation? Hard to say immediately. The 320 ETH is unlikely to move market prices by itself. But if this step becomes part of a larger trend toward institutional and sovereign staking, the cumulative effect on demand and network security could indirectly support ETH’s long-term value proposition.
Ethereum
Vitalik Buterin’s $760K Bet on Privacy: What His Donation to Session & SimpleX Chat Signals for Crypto Messaging
The Ethereum Co-Founder’s Move Sends a Clear Message
When Vitalik Buterin committed a six-figure sum to two emerging privacy-focused messaging apps, it wasn’t just philanthropy — it was a strategic statement. Buterin donated 256 ETH, worth around $760,000, split evenly between Session and SimpleX Chat. His stated goal was to support projects pushing the boundaries of messaging privacy, especially those eliminating traditional identifiers like phone numbers and making metadata invisible.
This kind of move doesn’t happen in a vacuum. In a time when digital surveillance is tightening and governments are scrutinizing communication platforms with increasing intensity, Buterin’s gesture highlights a pivot: from just end-to-end encryption to full-stack privacy, where even metadata — who, when, how often — is protected.
Why Session and SimpleX Matter Now
Session and SimpleX represent a different paradigm from mainstream encrypted apps like Signal or Telegram. Session leverages a decentralized onion-routing network to remove central points of failure and obscure the origin and destination of messages. It doesn’t require a phone number or email to create an account, which means your communication identity isn’t linked to your real-world ID.
SimpleX Chat takes a similarly radical approach. It discards all global user identifiers and uses temporary, non-persistent session IDs. By default, it avoids any server-side storage of user metadata. This pushes the envelope on what private messaging can mean in a Web3 context.
But these aren’t just fringe apps. They represent a broader movement aiming to decouple identity from communication — something that increasingly resonates in crypto-native communities, where pseudonymity and sovereignty are core values.
More Than Encryption: The Metadata Battle
Traditional “secure messaging” has largely focused on content encryption — making sure only sender and receiver can read the messages. But in reality, metadata often tells a more powerful story. When messages were sent, how often you interact with someone, and your communication graph can all be used for behavioral profiling or even retroactive surveillance.
Buterin made clear that metadata privacy is what matters most now. Without tackling this, he argued, truly private communication cannot exist. That’s what sets his donation apart from the usual talk around encryption — it’s a direct endorsement of messaging without identifiers, without centralized relays, and without traceable networks.
This push is timely. As lawmakers in the EU and elsewhere explore so-called “chat control” proposals that would force companies to scan messages or retain metadata, the crypto space is responding by building alternatives. These aren’t just apps — they’re defensive tools for digital sovereignty.
A New Standard for Web3 Messaging
The implications for the broader crypto and Web3 landscape are significant. Messaging is the most common digital activity, and yet Web3 has largely ignored it in favor of finance and infrastructure. But with Buterin’s donation, a clear priority emerges: communication deserves the same decentralization and privacy guarantees that DeFi or NFTs claim to offer.
These apps could become part of a broader stack of decentralized identity and communication tools. Imagine wallets that message, DAOs that coordinate privately, or pseudonymous communities built on trustless comms. It’s not hard to see a future where crypto-native messaging protocols replace traditional platforms for everything from coordination to customer support.
That said, the technical challenges are steep. Delivering strong metadata privacy without sacrificing multi-device support, uptime, or usability is no easy feat. Session, for instance, still struggles with message delivery in fringe networks. SimpleX is relatively new and has yet to scale its infrastructure globally.
But if these projects succeed, they may define what Web3 communication should look like: decentralized, permissionless, and invisible to the watchers.
What Comes Next
Vitalik Buterin’s donation is a catalyst, but it also raises expectations. Privacy-focused apps like Session and SimpleX must now prove they can scale beyond early adopters. That means building user-friendly interfaces, integrating with crypto tools, and making privacy seamless — not a technical obstacle.
If these apps succeed, they could become foundational in the same way MetaMask or Uniswap did in their domains. And if others follow Buterin’s lead — both with capital and adoption — we could see a serious pivot in Web3 toward communication infrastructure that doesn’t leak our lives through metadata.
In the age of AI surveillance, mass data collection, and algorithmic profiling, who you message — not just what you say — is a liability. But with projects like Session and SimpleX now backed by Ethereum’s most influential founder, the path to invisible messaging just got a powerful new boost.
Ethereum
Offchain Labs Pushes Back on Vitalik Buterin’s RISC‑V Proposal, Says WASM Is the Smarter Path for Ethereum
In a move that could influence the next generation of blockchain architecture, Offchain Labs — the core developer behind the Arbitrum ecosystem — has publicly challenged Vitalik Buterin’s recently floated idea to adopt the RISC‑V instruction set architecture (ISA) as the foundation for Ethereum’s execution layer. The research team argues that while RISC‑V has become prominent in zero‑knowledge (ZK) proof systems, it may not be the optimal choice for smart‑contract delivery on layer one. Instead, they propose WebAssembly (WASM) as a more future‑proof format.
The Core of the Debate
Offchain Labs’ researchers introduce a useful conceptual separation: the “delivery ISA” (dISA), which defines how contracts are uploaded and stored on‑chain, versus the “proving ISA” (pISA), which is used by ZK‑VMs to verify execution. They argue that Vitalik’s proposal implicitly assumes a single ISA should serve both roles, but this assumption risks locking Ethereum into a format optimized for today’s ZK proving, not long‑term delivery and flexibility.
The team points out that RISC‑V has shown strong performance in ZK proof contexts, but it does not necessarily perform well in diverse node‑hardware environments, where most clients do not run native RISC‑V CPUs. Emulating RISC‑V on commonly used hardware introduces inefficiencies and may undermine decentralization. WASM, by contrast, executes efficiently on general hardware, is type‑safe, and benefits from a robust and well‑supported developer ecosystem.
Implications for Ethereum’s Future
The research suggests that anchoring Ethereum’s delivery ISA to RISC‑V now could effectively freeze the ecosystem into a proving‑ISA strategy that may become outdated as ZK‑VM architectures evolve. They caution that RISC‑V was never designed primarily for ZK proving or smart‑contract delivery but rather for hardware microprocessors — a fact that limits its long‑term suitability in a general‑purpose blockchain context.
By selecting WASM for contract delivery, with the option to compile it into whatever proving ISA emerges as superior, the blockchain ecosystem retains flexibility, avoids hardware lock‑in, and aligns smart‑contract deployment with a mature and widely supported programming standard. Offchain Labs argues WASM could philosophically serve as an “Internet protocol” layer for smart contracts — agnostic to the underlying hardware or proof system.
Why This Matters Right Now
Ethereum is nearing a set of protocol design decisions that will shape not just the next upgrade, but its evolution over the coming decade. As ZK proof technologies evolve and node hardware becomes increasingly heterogeneous, selecting an ISA for Layer 1 becomes a strategic architectural choice, not just a technical one. If Ethereum adopts an ISA optimized solely for today’s proving stack, it may compromise adaptability, decentralization, and inclusivity across hardware platforms.
Offchain Labs’ response reframes the ISA decision as a battle between flexibility and immediate efficiency. Their argument is simple: prioritize future‑proofing over optimization for today’s ZK tech.
What to Monitor
Over the next several months, developers and observers should keep an eye on Ethereum’s core roadmap and community discussions. Will the network choose separate ISAs for delivery and proving? Will it commit to RISC‑V or pivot to WASM? The maturity of tooling, compiler support, and infrastructure around WASM could prove decisive, especially as alternative ZK‑VM designs begin to experiment with non‑RISC architectures.
Ultimately, this may look like a low‑level implementation dispute, but it reveals something deeper: Ethereum’s infrastructure choices today will define its trajectory for the next decade. The RISC‑V vs. WASM debate is not just about smart contracts — it’s about what kind of computational future Ethereum wants to build.
-
Cardano2 months agoCardano Breaks Ground in India: Trivolve Tech Launches Blockchain Forensic System on Mainnet
-
Cardano2 months agoCardano Reboots: What the Foundation’s New Roadmap Means for the Blockchain Race
-
Cardano2 days agoSolana co‑founder publicly backs Cardano — signaling rare cross‑chain respect after 2025 chain‑split recovery
-
Bitcoin2 months agoQuantum Timebomb: Is Bitcoin’s Foundation About to Crack?
-
Cardano2 months agoAfter the Smoke Clears: Cardano, Vouchers, and the Vindication of Charles Hoskinson
-
Cardano2 months agoMidnight and Google Cloud Join Forces to Power Privacy‑First Blockchain Infrastructure
-
Ripple2 months agoRipple CTO David “JoelKatz” Schwartz to Step Down by Year’s End, but Will Remain on Board
-
News2 months agoRipple’s DeFi Awakening: How mXRP Is Redefining the Role of XRP
